My 'smart' dishwasher glitched and ordered THREE YEARS of tablets: SALLY SORTS IT
Conspiracy Theorists Don't Realize They're On the Fringe
Read more of this story at Slashdot.
Plans for 233 new homes in Essex town named UK's best place to live
The surprising reason why Prince William 'annoys' his aunt Princess Anne is revealed
'I died for 45 minutes and my family grieved me - then I got better'
Five men accused of violent disorder during Epping protests are named
The virtually unheard of Essex beach so pretty that people think is in the Mediterranean
Stop flooding us with AI-based grant applications, begs Health Institute
ai-pocalypse Amid expectations that the Trump administration will introduce an AI Action Plan on Wednesday to boost the use of AI in government, the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) are pleading for less of it.…
Representative Line: JSONception
I am on record as not particularly loving JSON as a serialization format. It's fine, and I'm certainly not going to die on any hills over it, but I think that as we stripped down the complexity of XML we threw away too much.
On the flip side, the simplicity means that it's harder to use it wrong. It's absent many footguns.
Well, one might think. But then Hootentoot ran into a problem. You see, an internal partner needed to send them a JSON document which contains a JSON document. Now, one might say, "isn't any JSON object a valid sub-document? Can't you just nest JSON inside of JSON all day? What could go wrong here?"
"value":"[{\"value\":\"1245\",\"begin_datum\":\"2025-05-19\",\"eind_datum\":null},{\"value\":\"1204\",\"begin_datum\":\"2025-05-19\",\"eind_datum\":\"2025-05-19\"}]",This. This could go wrong. They embedded JSON inside of JSON… as a string.
Hootentoot references the hottest memes of a decade and a half ago to describe this Xzibit:
Yo dawg, i heard you like JSON, so i've put some JSON in your JSON