X

Aggregator

Amazon Launches First Kuiper Internet Satellites

Slashdot
2 weeks 4 days ago
Amazon successfully launched the first 27 satellites for its Project Kuiper internet constellation, kicking off a major effort to compete with Starlink by deploying over 1,600 satellites by mid-2026. It company is investing $10 billion in Kuiper and plans to begin commercial service later this year. CNBC reports: "We had a nice smooth countdown, beautiful weather, beautiful liftoff, and Atlas V is on its way to orbit to take those 27 Kuiper satellites, put them on their way and really start this new era in internet connectivity," Caleb Weiss, a systems engineer at ULA, said on the livestream following the launch. The satellites are expected to separate from the rocket roughly 280 miles above Earth's surface, at which point Amazon will look to confirm the satellites can independently maneuver and communicate with its employees on the ground. [...] In his shareholder letter earlier this month, Amazon CEO Andy Jassy said Kuiper will require upfront investment at first, but eventually the company expects it to be "a meaningful operating income and ROIC business for us." ROIC stands for return on invested capital. Investors will be listening for any commentary around further capex spend on Kuiper when Amazon reports first-quarter earnings after the bell on Thursday. A livestream can be found here.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

BeauHD

CodeSOD: The Wrong Kind of Character

The Daily WTF
2 weeks 4 days ago

Today's code, at first, just looks like using literals instead of constants. Austin sends us this C#, from an older Windows Forms application:

if (e.KeyChar == (char)4) { // is it a ^D? e.Handled = true; DoStuff(); } else if (e.KeyChar == (char)7) { // is it a ^g? e.Handled = true; DoOtherStuff(); } else if (e.KeyChar == (char)Keys.Home) { e.Handled = true; SpecialGoToStart(); } else if (e.KeyChar == (char)Keys.End) { e.Handled = true; SpecialGoToEnd(); }

Austin discovered this code when looking for a bug where some keyboard shortcuts didn't work. He made some incorrect assumptions about the code- first, that they were checking for a KeyDown or KeyUp event, a pretty normal way to check for keyboard shortcuts. Under that assumption, a developer would compare the KeyEventArgs.KeyCode property against an enum- something like e.KeyCode == Keys.D && Keys.Control, for a CTRL+D. That's clearly not what's happening here.

No, here, they used the KeyPressEvent, which is meant to represent the act of typing. That gives you a KeyPressEventArgs with a KeyChar property- because again, it's meant to represent typing text not keyboard shortcuts. They used the wrong event type, as it won't tell them about modifier keys in use, or gracefully handle the home or end keys. KeyChar is the ASCII character code of the key press: which, in this case, CTRL+D is the "end of transmit" character in ASCII (4), and CTRL+G is the goddamn bell character (7). So those two branches work.

But home and end don't have ASCII code points. They're not characters that show up in text. They get key codes, which represent the physical key pressed, not the character of text. So (char)Keys.Home isn't really a meaningful operation. But the enum is still a numeric value, so you can still turn it into a character- it just turns into a character that emphatically isn't the home key. It's the "$". And Keys.End turns into a "#".

It wasn't very much work for Austin to move the event handler to the correct event type, and switch to using KeyCodes, which were both more correct and more readable.

[Advertisement] Keep all your packages and Docker containers in one place, scan for vulnerabilities, and control who can access different feeds. ProGet installs in minutes and has a powerful free version with a lot of great features that you can upgrade when ready.Learn more.
Remy Porter

Car Subscription Features Raise Your Risk of Government Surveillance, Police Records Show

Slashdot
2 weeks 4 days ago
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Wired: Automakers are increasingly pushing consumers to accept monthly and annual fees to unlock preinstalled safety and performance features, from hands-free driving systems and heated seats to cameras that can automatically record accident situations. But the additional levels of internet connectivity this subscription model requires can increase drivers' exposure to government surveillance and the likelihood of being caught up in police investigations. A cache of more than two dozen police records recently reviewed by WIRED show US law enforcement agencies regularly trained on how to take advantage of "connected cars," with subscription-based features drastically increasing the amount of data that can be accessed during investigations. The records make clear that law enforcement's knowledge of the surveillance far exceeds that of the public and reveal how corporate policies and technologies -- not the law -- determine driver privacy. "Each manufacturer has their whole protocol on how the operating system in the vehicle utilizes telematics, mobile Wi-Fi, et cetera," one law enforcement officer noted in a presentation prepared by the California State Highway Patrol (CHP) and reviewed by WIRED. The presentation, while undated, contains statistics on connected cars for the year 2024. "If the vehicle has an active subscription," they add, "it does create more data." The CHP presentation, obtained by government transparency nonprofit Property of the People via a public records request, trains police on how to acquire data based on a variety of hypothetical scenarios, each describing how vehicle data can be acquired based on the year, make, and model of a vehicle. The presentation acknowledges that access to data can ultimately be limited due to choices made by not only vehicle manufacturers but the internet service providers on which connected devices rely. One document notes, for instance, that when a General Motors vehicle is equipped with an active OnStar subscription, it will transmit data -- revealing its location -- roughly twice as often as a Ford vehicle. Different ISPs appear to have not only different capabilities but policies when it comes to responding to government requests for information. Police may be able to rely on AT&T to help identify certain vehicles based on connected devices active in the car but lack the ability to do so when the device relies on a T-Mobile or Verizon network instead. [...] Nearly all subscription-based car features rely on devices that come preinstalled in a vehicle, with a cellular connection necessary only to enable the automaker's recurring-revenue scheme. The ability of car companies to charge users to activate some features is effectively the only reason the car's systems need to communicate with cell towers. The police documents note that companies often hook customers into adopting the services through free trial offers, and in some cases the devices are communicating with cell towers even when users decline to subscribe.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.

BeauHD

Open source text editor poisoned with malware to target Uyghur users

The Register
2 weeks 4 days ago
Who could possibly be behind this attack on an ethnic minority China despises?

Researchers at Canada’s Citizen Lab have spotted a phishing campaign and supply chain attack directed at Uyghur people living outside China, and suggest it’s an example of Beijing’s attempts to target the ethnic minority group.…

Simon Sharwood